Canis ISSN: 2398-2942
Diabetes mellitus: dietary management
Contributor(s): Carmel Mooney
- Insulin therapy provides the mainstay of treatment for most diabetic dogs Diabetes mellitus but management of other factors including diet and exercise can influence overall glycemic control.
- Almost all diabetic dogs require insulin therapy to control hyperglycemia of diabetes mellitus Diabetes mellitus: pathophysiology : dietary management alone is not appropriate.
- Dietary management should aim to:
- Achieve and maintain optimal body condition.
- Provide a complete balanced ration that is palatable, readily accepted and predictably consumed on a daily basis.
- Maintain consistency in type of food including calorific content, formulation and volume.
- Timed to provide adequate substrate for insulin activity.
- Avoid sharp postprandial increases in blood glucose concentration.
- There is no clear evidence that any one particular diet is essential to achieve good glycemia control.
- There are a number of diets that have been specially formulated for the management of diabetic patients with some evidence that they may improve glycemic control but without a discernable effect on insulin dose administered.
- The nutritional requirements of any concurrent illness for which there is a known dietary therapy should take precedence in diabetic cases.
- Dry or canned foods are appropriate but semi-moist diets should be avoided as they contain large amounts of simple sugars that can result in large increases in postprandial glucose concentrations.
- Adequate day-to-day consistency in caloric content, formulation and volume can be more difficult to achieve with home-made rations.
- Both obesity Obesity and poor body condition are associated with poor diabetic stability and need appropriate management in individual dogs.
- The glycemic index ranks a food based on its potential to increase blood glucose concentrations. Foods with a high glycemic index result in more rapid and higher postprandial blood glucose concentration, whilst those with a low glycemic index result in a lower and more prolonged postprandial blood glucose concentration.
- The glycemic index is based on the type of carbohydrate present, the matrix in which it is found, the processing undergone and the total amount ingested.
- Simple sugars of low glycemic index should be avoided.
- Complex carbohydrates of high glycemic index are potentially beneficial. These are unlikely to be found in digestible diets designed for gastrointestinal disease.
- Fiber reduces postprandial hyperglycemia by delaying gastric emptying, slowing starch hydrolysis, interfering with glucose absorption and altering gastrointestinal transit time.
- Improved glycemic control has been demonstrated in diabetic dogs fed a diet high in insolule fiber or a mixture of soluble and insoluble fiber compared to when fed a low fiber diet.
- There is less difference in glycemic control achieved using high fiber moderate carbohydrate compared to moderate fiber low carbohydrate diets.
- High fiber diets of low energy content may result in weight loss in dogs as a result of reduced intake because of reduced palatability or increased satiety. They are not suitable for dogs that need to gain weight.
- Dietary fiber may have additional beneficial effects on lipid profiles in diabetic dogs.
- The lipid derangements in human diabetic patients predispose to coronary artery disease and may impact diabetic stabilization.
- Increased fiber and decreased dietary fat content, or a combination, result in lower circulating cholesterol, free glycerol and free fatty acid concentrations in diabetic dogs and may have a beneficial effect on triglyceride concentration compared with low fiber and high fat diets.
- Hypertriglyceridemia is a risk factor for pancreatitis Pancreatitis: acute and increased fiber and restricted fat diets may be beneficial in at risk cases.
- To prevent protein catabolism, the diet should provide protein of adequate quantity and quality.
- Diabetic nephropathy Diabetes mellitus: glomerulonephropathy , whilst common in humans, is rare in dogs and restricted protein diets are therefore no considered necessary.
- If the diet is balanced and complete and fed in an appropriate quantity for optimal body condition, there is no need for additional vitamin and mineral supplementation.
- There is limited evidence that dietary supplementation with chromium or vanadium has any effect on glycemic control in diabetic dogs.
This article is available in full to registered subscribers
Sign up now to purchase a 30 day trial, or
- Recent references from PubMed and VetMedResource.
- Fleeman L M, Rand J S & Markwell P J (2009) Lack of advantage of high-fibre, moderate carbohydrate diets in dogs with stabilised diabetes. JSAP 50 (11), 604-614 PubMed.
- Graham P A, Maskell E, Rawlings J M et al (2002) Influence of a high fibre diet on glycemic control and quality of life in dogs with diabetes mellitus. JSAP 43 (2), 67-73 PubMed.
- Kimmel S E, Michel K E, Hess R S et al (2000) Effects of insoluble and soluble dietary fiber on glycemic control in dogs with naturally occurring insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. JAVMA 216 (7), 1076-1081 PubMed.
- Nelson R W, Duesberg C A, Ford S L et al (1998) Effect of dietary insoluble fiber on control of glycemia in dogs with naturally acquired diabetes mellitus. JAVMA 212 (3), 380-386 PubMed.
- Graham P A, Maskell I E & Nash A S (1994) Canned high fiber diet and postprandial glycemia in dogs with naturally occurring diabetes mellitus. J Nutr 124 (12 Suppl), 2712S-2715S PubMed.
- Blaxter A C, Cripps P K & Gruffyddd-Jones T J (1990) Dietary fiber and post prandial hyperglycemia in normal and diabetic dogs. JSAP 31 (5), 229-233 VetMedResource.
- Holste L C, Nelson R W, Feldman E C et al (1989) Effect of dry, soft moist and canned food on postprandial blood glucose and insulin concentrations in healthy dogs. Am J Vet Res 50 (6), 984-989 PubMed.
Other sources of information
- Zoran D L (2014) Diet and diabetes. In: Kirk's Current Veterinary Therapy XV. Eds Bonagura J D & Twedt D C, Elsevier Saunders, St Louis, Missouri. pp 199-204.